Posthumous Appreciation: John K. Shank
Large view
You never know where a poem will end up....
Every so often I Google myself. What turns up is a hodgepodge of magazine indices, running race results, transcription acknowledgements, blog material, personal profiles, and whatnot.
On Thursday I learned that a poem of mine had been used in a business school case, in what I think is a very cool way. I was delighted for a number of reasons, but I immediately searched for the author's contact info because he hadn't included bibliographic information about where the poem was first published. Properly, that should be included.
The case is Professor John K. Shank's "Jones Ironworks, Inc.". My poem, "Labor Intensive," appears at the end. My name is there as the author (hence the Google find), but the sonnet first appeared in the Harvard Business Review's July-August 1986 issue, No. 86414. "Labor Intensive" follows Professor Wickham Skinner's article, "The productivity paradox."
Shank adapted his case from one written by Professor Felix Kollaritsch of the Ohio State University, but I couldn't find out from a Web search if Kollaritsch had also used the poem.
I also wrote to Shank that having my poem appear in a case creates an educational full circle. It was inspired by a presentation given at the Harvard Business School, where I was then employed. The poem's genesis, however, lay in the stories told by Professor Lee A. Borah, Jr., now retired from Wagner College, where I received my BA in Psychology. Dr. Borah and I still keep in touch. His Industrial Psychology course exposed me to my first case study. I subsequently acquired an MS in Applied Psychology from Stevens Institute of Technology, with a concentration in Human Factors.
The inspiration for "Labor Intensive" also produced "Cog." I'd sent that story first to Tales of the Unanticipated, a magazine of the Minnesota Science Fiction Society, in honor of Dr. Borah's education at the University of Minnesota. "Cog" appeared in TOTU's Fall/Winter 1988 issue.
Almost three-quarters of my e-mail to Shank was my response to his case, because it sparked my own critical analysis muscles.
A search for "Jones Ironworks" shows the case has been taught at the Asian Institute of Technology School of Management, the University of Alabama, Johns Hopkins University, Marshall University in West Virginia, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University in Thailand, the University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business, the University of Texas at Dallas, the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, and the University of Washington Business School -- in addition to the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, where Shank had taught. The case is also part of Professor Shank's book, Cases in Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis, published through South-Western College Publishing and available through numerous outlets.
I sent my e-mail off to Shank. It bounced back. I did another search -- and learned that Professor Shank died on March 30, 2006.
Wrote Tuck School Dean, Paul Damos:
Professor Shank touched the lives of thousands of students, faculty members and business leaders over the course of his academic career at Harvard, Tuck, Ohio State, Babson, and the Naval Post Graduate School....Many graduates over his twenty year career at Tuck will remember his incredible presence in the classroom and his amazing intellect. He published 16 books and wrote more than 100 articles for leading journals in accounting, finance and management. Far from complete retirement, John was still writing and teaching, and he had just joined the Board of Directors of Lazard, Ltd....John was a core member of the Tuck family, a mentor and friend to
many, and a passionate soul who had an impact on all that he met." (Tuck2000 Blog)
I wish I'd known about the case when he was still alive, so that I could have thanked him then. I've mailed a printout of my e-mail and condolences to the Tuck School.
A Counter-Editorial
Every so often I get material forwarded from several sources. Sometimes they're urban myths, and I know almost immediately to check them out at Snopes.com. But in the case of this one, I first wrote my own editorial response (which I rarely do) for the "Reply to All" category. The Snopes.com site referenced below contains the text of the "editorial" that came to me.
To prove that I am real and not an urban myth, I decided to post my response here as well.
------------E-mail response begins------------
Normally I don't comment on these e-mails ... but today I felt I had to.
After I wrote my response (which now follows the information below), I checked Snopes.com, a site that debunks urban myths. Here is what I found at
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/allah.asp
Snopes writes:
"Reporter Greg Kearney, writing for the Lee News Service, traced the story to a correctional facility in Fulton, Missouri, and came away with a decidedly different version of events from Missouri state officials....The man who gave the presentation about Islam was not a Muslim minister; he was an inmate pressed into service to present a short film on Islam and and answer some questions when the prison's Volunteer Coordinator was 'unable to find an Imam to speak.'"
Snopes goes on to quote Tim Kniest, Public Information Officer for the Missouri Department of Corrections, who said, "...the Volunteer Coordinator at the prison said that no such exchange as the editorial reported ever took place....the coordinator does not recall any questions dealing with jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world as reported in the editorial."
Not only was there no shame involved, and no head-hanging, but the inmate had been "thanked by the assembly before being escorted back to his quarters."
Before I checked Snopes.com, I wrote the following, to which I've added a couple of lines since:
1. How many of you have read the Tanakh?
2. How many of you know what the Tanakh is? (For those of you who don't, it's what non-Jews and many Jews, including myself, call the "Old Testament" -- but originally it was called the Tanakh.)
3. How many of you have read the New Testament?
4. Which version? Do you know how many different versions there are? Do you know how differently they read from one another, how many different interpretations of the ancient Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek?
5. How many of you have read the Koran?
I have read several versions of the Tanakh and of the New Testament cover to cover. I have also read one version of the Koran from cover to cover, and texts in other faiths as well.
6. How many of you know that the Koran refers to Jews, Christians, and Muslims all as "of the Book"?
I am Jewish.
My mother taught English in an inner-city high school during the 60s and 70s. When I was a kid, she told me stories about her job that would curl your hair. Mixed in with those nightmares were stories of simple and profound decency.
During the 1967 War, she told me about three girls in one of her classes: one Jew, one Muslim Arab, one Black. They were best friends.
They told her, "We can get along. Why can't they?"
There will always be peoples of different faiths who are extremists. And who are moderates. And who are pacifists. And who are idealists.
And who are liars.
There are different ways of interpreting "of the Book." Surah II in the Koran makes mention of the fighting between Jews and Christians who can't agree on how to interpret the Book (and as I interpret the Koran, the Book means the Bible). The word "Muslim" means "to submit." Some might interpret that as submitting to a human conqueror, a terrorist perhaps. Others might interpret that as submitting to the Law as handed down to Moses, whom the Koran calls Musa. Others might interpret that as submitting to someone else's god.
Some might interpret it as submitting to an "editorial," penned in hatred, without first checking the facts.
From my reading of the Koran, I interpret "Allah" as being another word for "Jehovah," the way "Isa" is another word for "Jesus," "Musa" is another word for "Moses," and "Ibrahim" is another word for "Abraham." It's a matter of language.
But don't take my word for it. Read the text for yourself and make your own interpretations.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/koran.html
is an electronic text version of the Shakir translation that I first read in hardcopy in the 1980s.
I've sat in on Bible study meetings and heard different interpretations of the New Testament. I've transcribed Midrash: scholarly discussions concerning passages in the Tanakh.
People disagree about scripture all the time. Some use their interpretations as reason to take a gun into their hands. Some choose to look for common ground, to try to reach past hatred and extremism. I've known Muslims who are far different from the nonexistent "imam" in Mathes's article.
There are no easy answers. There are always shades of gray.
But we are all human beings. Let's start from there.
[end of entry]
To prove that I am real and not an urban myth, I decided to post my response here as well.
------------E-mail response begins------------
Normally I don't comment on these e-mails ... but today I felt I had to.
After I wrote my response (which now follows the information below), I checked Snopes.com, a site that debunks urban myths. Here is what I found at
http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/allah.asp
Snopes writes:
"Reporter Greg Kearney, writing for the Lee News Service, traced the story to a correctional facility in Fulton, Missouri, and came away with a decidedly different version of events from Missouri state officials....The man who gave the presentation about Islam was not a Muslim minister; he was an inmate pressed into service to present a short film on Islam and and answer some questions when the prison's Volunteer Coordinator was 'unable to find an Imam to speak.'"
Snopes goes on to quote Tim Kniest, Public Information Officer for the Missouri Department of Corrections, who said, "...the Volunteer Coordinator at the prison said that no such exchange as the editorial reported ever took place....the coordinator does not recall any questions dealing with jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world as reported in the editorial."
Not only was there no shame involved, and no head-hanging, but the inmate had been "thanked by the assembly before being escorted back to his quarters."
Before I checked Snopes.com, I wrote the following, to which I've added a couple of lines since:
1. How many of you have read the Tanakh?
2. How many of you know what the Tanakh is? (For those of you who don't, it's what non-Jews and many Jews, including myself, call the "Old Testament" -- but originally it was called the Tanakh.)
3. How many of you have read the New Testament?
4. Which version? Do you know how many different versions there are? Do you know how differently they read from one another, how many different interpretations of the ancient Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek?
5. How many of you have read the Koran?
I have read several versions of the Tanakh and of the New Testament cover to cover. I have also read one version of the Koran from cover to cover, and texts in other faiths as well.
6. How many of you know that the Koran refers to Jews, Christians, and Muslims all as "of the Book"?
I am Jewish.
My mother taught English in an inner-city high school during the 60s and 70s. When I was a kid, she told me stories about her job that would curl your hair. Mixed in with those nightmares were stories of simple and profound decency.
During the 1967 War, she told me about three girls in one of her classes: one Jew, one Muslim Arab, one Black. They were best friends.
They told her, "We can get along. Why can't they?"
There will always be peoples of different faiths who are extremists. And who are moderates. And who are pacifists. And who are idealists.
And who are liars.
There are different ways of interpreting "of the Book." Surah II in the Koran makes mention of the fighting between Jews and Christians who can't agree on how to interpret the Book (and as I interpret the Koran, the Book means the Bible). The word "Muslim" means "to submit." Some might interpret that as submitting to a human conqueror, a terrorist perhaps. Others might interpret that as submitting to the Law as handed down to Moses, whom the Koran calls Musa. Others might interpret that as submitting to someone else's god.
Some might interpret it as submitting to an "editorial," penned in hatred, without first checking the facts.
From my reading of the Koran, I interpret "Allah" as being another word for "Jehovah," the way "Isa" is another word for "Jesus," "Musa" is another word for "Moses," and "Ibrahim" is another word for "Abraham." It's a matter of language.
But don't take my word for it. Read the text for yourself and make your own interpretations.
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/koran.html
is an electronic text version of the Shakir translation that I first read in hardcopy in the 1980s.
I've sat in on Bible study meetings and heard different interpretations of the New Testament. I've transcribed Midrash: scholarly discussions concerning passages in the Tanakh.
People disagree about scripture all the time. Some use their interpretations as reason to take a gun into their hands. Some choose to look for common ground, to try to reach past hatred and extremism. I've known Muslims who are far different from the nonexistent "imam" in Mathes's article.
There are no easy answers. There are always shades of gray.
But we are all human beings. Let's start from there.
[end of entry]
In Honor of IPSTD
Thanks to Lisa Mantchev for alerting me to International Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Day.
According to its originator and host Jo Walton ("Bluejo"), IPSTD is, "the day when pixel-stained technopeasants everywhere are stretching and smiling and putting down their technotools to celebrate their existence by releasing their works into the wild, or at least the web."
Bluejo hosts IPSTD over here. Since I already have a couple of stories up on my webpage, I added my link to the growing list.
My sampler (found here) contains two of my 1980s publications. "Cog" (second one down, but I list it first here because IPSTD focuses mainly on science fiction and fantasy) appeared in Tales of the Unanticipated, Fall/Winter 1988. "Variations for Four Hands" appeared in the erotica journal Yellow Silk, No. 14, Spring 1985.
In other news, my "Journal Series" post on Flickr has been chosen to appear on Notebookism.com, founded by Armand B. Frasco. His blog description opens with, "We all share a pleasant affliction - the urge to create on paper."
The original Flickr post also contains my answer to the comment/question: "How long does it usually take for you to complete a notebook?" That led me to do some number crunching, which illustrated the effect my blogging has on my longhand journal (and vice-versa).
Sometimes my journal material makes it (with some edits) into publication, such as, "January 1985: A Day in Lawrence, Massachusetts," now in Issue 60 of Reed. Or it becomes a performance piece, as was the case on April 6 at the Woodview Coffeehouse.
And I send way-overdue thanks to Colleen over at Loose Leaf Notes for giving me a Thinking Blogger Award in her April 6 entry.
"Those who have been awarded are asked to name five others to pass the 'thinking blogger' torch on to," presents me with the challenge of narrowing down to five a goodly number of blogs I have enjoyed. Given more time and a faster computer connection, I'd be reading more than I already am. Even so, this'll be a tough choice. Stay tuned.
[end of entry]
According to its originator and host Jo Walton ("Bluejo"), IPSTD is, "the day when pixel-stained technopeasants everywhere are stretching and smiling and putting down their technotools to celebrate their existence by releasing their works into the wild, or at least the web."
Bluejo hosts IPSTD over here. Since I already have a couple of stories up on my webpage, I added my link to the growing list.
My sampler (found here) contains two of my 1980s publications. "Cog" (second one down, but I list it first here because IPSTD focuses mainly on science fiction and fantasy) appeared in Tales of the Unanticipated, Fall/Winter 1988. "Variations for Four Hands" appeared in the erotica journal Yellow Silk, No. 14, Spring 1985.
In other news, my "Journal Series" post on Flickr has been chosen to appear on Notebookism.com, founded by Armand B. Frasco. His blog description opens with, "We all share a pleasant affliction - the urge to create on paper."
The original Flickr post also contains my answer to the comment/question: "How long does it usually take for you to complete a notebook?" That led me to do some number crunching, which illustrated the effect my blogging has on my longhand journal (and vice-versa).
Sometimes my journal material makes it (with some edits) into publication, such as, "January 1985: A Day in Lawrence, Massachusetts," now in Issue 60 of Reed. Or it becomes a performance piece, as was the case on April 6 at the Woodview Coffeehouse.
And I send way-overdue thanks to Colleen over at Loose Leaf Notes for giving me a Thinking Blogger Award in her April 6 entry.
"Those who have been awarded are asked to name five others to pass the 'thinking blogger' torch on to," presents me with the challenge of narrowing down to five a goodly number of blogs I have enjoyed. Given more time and a faster computer connection, I'd be reading more than I already am. Even so, this'll be a tough choice. Stay tuned.
[end of entry]
Constructing and Reconstructing
Species TBD. A field of these grows in a wild patch behind the local animal clinic. More detail, including insects meandering at the center, is in the large view.
On Thursday I photographed new memories being built. On Friday I performed old ones....
The other day, I watched a wall go up in about 2-1/2 hours.
"Before" shot, taken around 1:30 PM when I arrived at the Art Center:
"After" shot, taken around 4 PM:
And a video for in-between:
Art Center Renovation II (2:32)
Some detail work:
More shots are in my photoset and on the Art Center's Renovation page.
Last night I performed at the Woodview Coffeehouse open mic. My past two times there I'd included excerpts from Covenant, but since we were in the middle of Passover in addition to Good Friday, I read from my 20-years-ago journal entry, "The Old Men of Revere Beach." After beginning with extemporaneous a cappella singing, I put my Yiddish brogue to good use here.
I was also fascinated by an instrument that one of the featured performers (in the duo Pete Price and Mike Roberts) used. He called it a "paddlewheel harmonica," which I think is the perfect name for it, although my Google search for that term turned up empty. For the first part of the set I couldn't help but notice this weird thing on the floor. From where I sat, it didn't even look like a musical instrument. Then it literally came into play for a song with a "modulation" (change in key) and captivated me. You can see one here.
When I told Mary about the harmonica, she expressed her interest in a slide kazoo. Simple enough, I thought. Not. I've found references to alto slide kazoos, tenor slide kazoos, contrabass slide kazoos, electric slide kazoos, and discussion on what kind of a mouthpiece to use on a slide kazoo. Though I believe the "left-handed E-flat slide kazoo" mentioned in one post plays in the same orchestra as PDQ Bach's Left-Handed Sewer Flute, lovingly detailed on the cover of his debut album, which I grew up with along with other mishegas:
I have yet to find a place that actually sells slide kazoos (even eBay showed zero candidates), but I'm hoping someone at a Boston Red Sox lexicon might be able to help me. Don't ask.
But stay tuned.
Jeepers, Peepers
Some years ago, a coworker mailed this link around my office. Depending on your dietary habits this time of year, it can be hilarious and terrifying by turns.
http://www.peepresearch.org/solubility.html
Say the authors, "Essentially, we found that Peeps are not soluble in water (a polar liquid), acetone (a non-polar liquid), sulfuric acid (a strong acid), or sodium hydroxide (a strong base)....Given enough time, the proper resources, and access to some really toxic stuff, one can probably dissolve just about anything except Peep eyes."
I'm really glad I never liked Peeps.
Wishing you all a very happy and healthy Easter!
[end of entry]
http://www.peepresearch.org/solubility.html
Say the authors, "Essentially, we found that Peeps are not soluble in water (a polar liquid), acetone (a non-polar liquid), sulfuric acid (a strong acid), or sodium hydroxide (a strong base)....Given enough time, the proper resources, and access to some really toxic stuff, one can probably dissolve just about anything except Peep eyes."
I'm really glad I never liked Peeps.
Wishing you all a very happy and healthy Easter!
[end of entry]
Hello, Young Lubbers (with apologies to Rodgers & Hammerstein)
Large view
Eastern Lubber Grasshoppers, Romalea guttata, Family Romaleidae (Lubber Grasshoppers). These juveniles were among my first awe-inspiring moments after we moved down here. I had never before seen grasshoppers with racing stripes....
Mary called my attention to this Lub Fest at around 5:30 PM as I performed my first weed-whacking of the season on Sunday. (My first reaction was, "Oooh, how cuuute!" Lubbers are pests, but I trust these will supply some good meals for the birds who hang around the premises. Adults are toxic to birds, according to the University of Florida, but I don't know about the nymphs.) The youngsters have gathered on a young oak in our front yard. They include both the yellow and the red "racing stripe" variety. We thought for certain our oakling would be eaten away by this morning, but it's still very much intact.
Hello, Young Lubbers: The Video
My wayward lens cap makes a brief cameo at lower left near the end.
Meanwhile, I'm about to begin Chapter 10 of Book #5.
That's less verbiage than it sounds like because these chapters are coming to me in vignettes. I think that's a function of the stage-setting: showing an overview of landscape and cultural changes that have occurred in the 15 years since Book #4, presented through the "You Are Here" establishment and points of view (POV) of two characters.
That's another change from the preceding volumes, which used multiple POV. Book #4 in particular had been an ensemble piece. In contrast, I'm limiting Book #5 to two POV: that of the title character from the new generation and that of a major protagonist from the old generation. Book #6, which I've also started drafting, has a different structure still, and will be the only volume in the series written in the first-person, through the eyes of several new generation characters. I'm still working out the story line for that one, but I have a rough outline of where I want to take it.
This may sound like I know what I'm doing. I don't. But that's part of the adventure. The title character is about to leave his home on a journey toward his eventual meeting with POV #2. That meeting, after a brief journey section, will begin the heart of the story. I see the overall structure as having four parts:
1) Statement of the problem/theme (main characters/setting intro)
2) Journey to the main development (world-building/recap)
3) Pas-de-deux (the heart of the drama/resolution of the problem)
4) Denouement (theme restatement/passing of the torch/bridge to Book #6)
If this were a symphony, the movements would be: (1) Allegro/Adagio; (2) Moderato; (3) Allegro agitato/Scherzo/Grave; and (4) Andante doloroso, ma non troppo
Or: (1) lively and fast, then slow; (2) at a moderate pace; (3) fast and agitated. "Scherzo," traditionally translated as, "a joke," is often a humorous interlude played in triple time, but mine will be more along the line of catharsis, followed by a slow and serious aftermath; and (4) moderately slow and sad, but not too sad.
It's also a first draft, which means everything is subject to change.
"Music fuel" for the writing has included Hector Berlioz's Symphonie Fantastique and the 5-and-a-half-minute movement "The Funeral of Karissima" from Arnold Bax's The Truth about the Russian Dancers, left on auto-repeat. I think the next section might rely a bit on Richard Strauss's Ein Heldenleben ("A Hero's Life," appropriate for a Bildungsroman like this), but I won't know for certain until I headphone myself in. The piece has been playing in my head, which is the equivalent of a young student waving a frantic hand in the air, shouting, "Me, me! Pick me!"
I've got a portrait sitting scheduled, in the attempt to get a decent publicity shot.
Mary called my attention to this article about recent high pollen counts. She's the one with the environmental allergies (enough to merit two antigen shots a week), but for several weeks until a few days ago I'd been feeling poorly enough to finally get a checkup and bloodwork done that I was due for, anyway. I started feeling considerably better and back to my old self on Friday, about the time the pollen reports for our area had dropped from High to Medium/High.
According to the article, a pollen count of 120 particles per cubic meter of air is considered extremely high for the Southeast. On Thursday, the pollen count for Atlanta had reached 5,937 particles: the second-highest level the Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic had ever recorded. I'm not sure how our area compares with Atlanta, but on Pollen.com's scale of 1-12, we've been ranking up over 10. Today we're down to a sprightly 8.8.
I'm just happy to be feeling better.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
- August (2)
- August (52)
- July (41)
- June (58)
- May (60)
- April (73)
- March (76)
- February (49)
- January (90)
- December (53)
- November (51)
- October (23)
- September (7)
- August (28)
- July (7)
- June (10)
- May (7)
- April (46)
- March (15)
- February (8)
- January (11)
- December (15)
- November (9)
- October (12)
- September (17)
- August (12)
- July (18)
- June (5)
- May (8)
- April (12)
- March (12)
- February (9)
- January (11)
- December (7)
- November (10)
- October (15)
- September (7)
- August (3)
- July (4)
- June (7)
- May (10)
- April (48)
- March (3)
- February (3)
- December (4)
- November (5)
- October (8)
- September (3)
- August (8)
- July (3)
- June (7)
- May (8)
- April (6)
- March (5)
- February (8)
- January (10)
- December (15)
- November (18)
- October (10)
- September (7)
- August (8)
- July (8)
- June (15)
- May (11)
- April (4)
- March (10)
- February (3)
- January (8)
- December (21)
- November (20)
- October (20)
- September (15)
- August (26)
- July (32)